Sophos Ideas

Do you have an idea for a Sophos product? Do you recognize a good idea when you see one? We want to hear from you!

Joshua

My feedback

  1. 383 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos ID Staging Test
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started  ·  71 comments  ·  Sophos Central » Endpoint Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joshua commented  · 

    At least have API for this!

    Joshua supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos ID Staging Test
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Cloud Optix  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joshua supported this idea  · 
  3. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos ID Staging Test
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Joshua supported this idea  · 
  4. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos ID Staging Test
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Joshua supported this idea  · 
  5. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos ID Staging Test
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Endpoint Protection » Web Security/Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joshua supported this idea  · 
  6. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos ID Staging Test
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Secure Web Gateway » Web Appliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have implemented a back-end feature to add X-Forwarded-For headers to HTTP requests in version 4.2.0 of the Web Appliance. At present it must be enabled by Sophos support but we are considering adding it as a UI option in the future.

    Note that this feature only works for non-secure HTTP so it may not help for the Google situation where the default is for traffic to use HTTPS. This is because with HTTPS, the headers are all part of the secured, encrypted communication within an SSL tunnel. There is no equivalent protocol that would work on SSL traffic.

    Joshua supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

icon-data-protection icon-endpoint-protection icon-phish-threat icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-mobile icon-sophos-utm icon-sophos-utm icon-sophos-utm icon-web-appliance icon-xg-firewall icon-xg-firewall icon-avid-secure icon-lightbulbCreated with Sketch.