Sophos Ideas

Do you have an idea for a Sophos product? Do you recognize a good idea when you see one? We want to hear from you!

flaserra

My feedback

  1. 204 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  SG UTM » Networking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    flaserra supported this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    Hi Alan,
    in fact I modified the default template to meet my needs, adding the info about maximum supported devices. About the cutting lines, I tried to delete them in the final pdf using acrobat pro (the lines are are really too wide), but the pdf built-in function that adds cutting lines, of course, will add only 4 signs (one for each corner, but it should be addedd 12 signs, when you print 8 voucher in a page). For the moment I added some very little signs to each corner in the template, but it is not an excellent solution (there are 32 signs in each page instead of 12, too many cuts :) ).

    flaserra shared this idea  · 
  3. 68 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  SG UTM » Mail Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    Sophos could reply that with this option, white list could be enormous, because for every sent message a new address would be added. I think that the best solution is: autowhitelist for most used email address.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    james, you are right, your suggestion is good

    flaserra supported this idea  · 
  4. 18 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  SG UTM » Network Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    Useful! I had to change an interface name and, of course, also all group names... but I cannot... :(

  5. 7 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  3 comments  ·  SG UTM » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    Totally agree!

  6. 188 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    30 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    how is managed the access to captive portal in v9 beta?

  7. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  6 comments  ·  SG UTM » Usability/GUI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    thanks for the changed status :)

    flaserra shared this idea  · 
  8. 18 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SG UTM » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    I agree with Achim, expecially in Italy it is it is not compliant to the privacy laws.

    flaserra supported this idea  · 
  9. 11 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SG UTM » Web Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    flaserra shared this idea  · 
  10. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SG UTM » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    In this case (more asg / red in separate geopgraphical areas), in my opinion, this feature shoul be move under ACC... not in reporting area of ASG.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    I think that the best way is to use a dedicated software for monitoring (you can choose between hundreds of different tests). I use AdvancedHostMonitor and I have connected a mobile phone with usb port.

  11. 188 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    26 comments  ·  SG UTM » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    @gerold, in most cases there is a network ups, not an usb ups, that manage all the server farm... so in my case I need to connect to UPS via lan

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    this idea has 1 year, when will be implemented? we need it, ASG is ***the ONLY device*** in our server room without lan connection to our APC ups... :(( I hope that developer team will soon accept this request

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    @steffen: I have the same problem, some months ago I ask for snmp support but it was just ignored... :(

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    @sammoe: you are right, it would be the best...

    flaserra supported this idea  · 
  12. 9 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    flaserra shared this idea  · 
  13. 10 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SG UTM » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    useful.... expecially if you have an expiration date in august :)

  14. 50 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  SG UTM » Usability/GUI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    from a commercial point of view, it's good to show unlicensed features, so customers can see what their product can offer...

  15. 38 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  SG UTM » Web Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    why?

  16. 30 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  SG UTM » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    I think that for a medium/large company the email notifications are too much invasive. Much better RSS Feed...

    I created a feature request for feed notifications (not for vpn): http://feature.astaro.com/forums/17359-astaro-security-gateway-feature-requests/suggestions/468674-add-notifications-with-rss-feeds

  17. 6 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    flaserra shared this idea  · 
  18. 7 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    Andreas, could you please explain better? I have no astaro ap, but I plan to buy some units (and it's not possbile to get demo units!).
    APs must use ASG as default gateway?

  19. 29 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  7 comments  ·  SG UTM » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    really needed, diagnosis feautres are never enough! :)

  20. 594 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Log in with your Sophos ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    52 comments  ·  SG UTM » Networking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    @Angelo: the bandwidth limit in ASG will be only for upstream (as now) or also for downstream?
    thanks

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    @Angelo: the bandwidth limit in ASG will be only for upstream (as now) or also for downstream?
    thanks

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    @Gert (I suppose you are admin): I would suggest to merge this request with this one: http://feature.astaro.com/forums/17359-astaro-gateway-feature-requests/suggestions/250437-proxy-with-per-user-bandwith-limit?ref=title

    They are very similar

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    this function should work also for proxied traffic....
    if you are running QoS in non-transparent mode you are not able to manage proxied traffic for http

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    I think that **196* votes are enough for Astaro to change the status of this idea :)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    flaserra commented  · 

    Yes you are right, I would avoid to manually enter those rules. It is not only an excessive effort to create them, but also to modify them. For example if I decide to increase the maximum bandwidth from 400 to 600, I have to modify each rule. If astaro would implement this function, this work would be very easy (obviously the auto-create rules should be invisible to admin).

← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base

icon-data-protection icon-endpoint-protection icon-phish-threat icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-mobile icon-sophos-utm icon-sophos-utm icon-sophos-utm icon-web-appliance icon-xg-firewall icon-xg-firewall icon-avid-secure icon-lightbulbCreated with Sketch.