Sophos Ideas

Do you have an idea for a Sophos product? Do you recognize a good idea when you see one? We want to hear from you!

SW

My feedback

  1. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW supported this idea  · 
  2. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  SG UTM » Application Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW shared this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Network Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW shared this idea  · 
  5. 61 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  SG UTM » Networking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW supported this idea  · 
    SW commented  · 

    Needed especially for Remote Access VPN via the emerging DS-Lite Connections (Cable Network Providers) to tunnel IPv4 traffic over IPv6 Internet Access.

  6. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SG UTM » Network Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW commented  · 

    @BigO
    It would just not possible to add this rule at the top. This is intended to force a clean rulebase.
    But it would be possible to add such a rule at the bottom of the rulebase.

    SW shared this idea  · 
  7. 37 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  SG UTM » Network Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW supported this idea  · 
    SW commented  · 

    I need this, too in the flavor of MS-RPC. It would be very useful in MS AD/Exchange Envinronments. Right now you must open tons of high ports to the DC.

  8. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Appliance Hardware  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW shared this idea  · 
  9. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Networking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW shared this idea  · 
  10. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  SG UTM » Network Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW commented  · 

    Would also be great for QoS. Give garanteed bandwith to everything except...

    SW supported this idea  · 
  11. 382 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    48 comments  ·  SG UTM » Web Server Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW supported this idea  · 
  12. 178 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    23 comments  ·  SG UTM » Web Server Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Planned  ·  Angelo Comazzetto responded

    We are hard at work on this feature and will deliver the first implementation of front end authentication as part of our Web Server protection (reverse proxy) in UTM 9.2. The public beta will begin in October. Stay Tuned!

  13. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  1 comment  ·  SG UTM » Usability/GUI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SW shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

icon-data-protection icon-endpoint-protection icon-phish-threat icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-mobile icon-sophos-utm icon-sophos-utm icon-sophos-utm icon-web-appliance icon-xg-firewall icon-xg-firewall icon-avid-secure icon-lightbulbCreated with Sketch.