John Lester
My feedback
-
27 votes
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
101 votes
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
36 votes1 comment · Data Protection » Sophos Central Full Disk Encryption · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
This is on the backlog for a future release.
We can’t control the GPO settings for the password complexity which means that if the Admin overrides password rules via central GPO settings then we can’t enforce the Central Device Encryption password rules on the endpoint. However, if there are no password rules defined via GPO, the Central Device Encryption password rules will apply.John Lester supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
41 votes
We discussed this when developing the application control policy for Sophos Central managed endpoints. At the time we decided to maintain feature parity with on-premise managed endpoints (SEC). While this capability is not available it is on our short list but does not appear on any planned delivery timelines at the moment. We evaluate and prioritize enhancements for the product multiple times per year.
An error occurred while saving the comment John Lester supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Under review for Sophos Mobile 9.5
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
22 votes
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Lester commented
Completely agree. If it's got a column header, it should be sortable. Or at least fast-searchable like SMC does.
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
15 votesUnder Review · 4 comments · Endpoint Protection » Sophos Enterprise Console (SEC) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
John Lester supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment John Lester commented
Me too. Genius!
-
5 votes
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
32 votes2 comments · Data Protection » SafeGuard Enterprise Full Disk Encryption · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
John Lester shared this idea ·
-
5 votes
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
4 votesUnder Review · 0 comments · Endpoint Protection » Web Security/Control · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Lester commented
+2 (coz I've run out of votes and everything open is also important to me!)
Mass management of servers is important for various reasons. Again, offerings like Terminal Services become easier to manage when you can group them together. -
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Lester commented
Completely agree. Especially as people use Terminal Services - Device Control becomes even more important on servers.
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Lester commented
We don't need to support multi domain syncs for this to work really. If I did one domain (domain\groups) and then also had manual groups for non-domain controlled machines (e.g. home user), it would still be useful to be able to search for just the domain groups to set policy on those rather than the non-domain groups.
John Lester shared this idea ·
-
164 votes
John Lester supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
John Lester supported this idea ·
We have an Enterprise customer in the UK wanting this feature now - I will send detail if you would like it.