Sophos Ideas

Do you have an idea for a Sophos product? Do you recognize a good idea when you see one? We want to hear from you!

Stefan H

My feedback

  1. 234 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started  ·  66 comments  ·  Sophos Central » Endpoint Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H commented  · 

    Jon, it is really frustrating that the first comment of sophos for the idea "offline installer" is - "it's not a offline installer".

    It's the same if the moderator of a dancing show says "we listen to music, but we dont't dance here".

    Your clarify absolutely dont sounds like what - we customers and partners - meant with the title of this idea.

    An installation package with additional parameter for the existing installer for a cache location is really not what a offline installer does and on other side it's already possible to install from cache location (see the link two posts before).

    An offline installer provides a graphical gui where computers can be selected or imported (via Windows Network Discovery, Active Directory Import, IP-Range, csv file) and so on. Then the "install button" is pressed and the machines are deployed. If a machine was not reachable while first attempt the installer try again for x times after elapsed time of x in between. - thats an offline installer. Tell this to your developers.

    Btw, it's absolutly okay to receive actual policies via internet, but after! first time installation. At! first time installation they should be that from the time the installation was created (meaning of offline). If not sure, make an selection for this question in the gui.

    A 4 minute search shows who already can do clean remote installs:
    Bitdefender
    Trend Micro
    Kaspersky
    Malwarebytes
    Avast Business
    Webroot
    McAfee
    F-Secure
    ...
    Indeed it was hard to find someone who cant do it - except sophos.
    I really can't understand why the compared high priced sophos can't do...
    And of course, the list above are our daily competitors.

    You make the selling hard for us...

    Stefan H commented  · 

    Meanwhile almost one a half years are passed and still no "real" offline installer. We are not interested in caches and workarrounds, just provide a real usable remote installation utility like all the others have.
    How long should we wait.... additional 2 years?...
    And of course - this is a mess... "offline install" while we have to copy all files manually - Really? - Come on make a program that does this and starts setup.exe afterwards. How hard this can be for development experts?...
    :https://community.sophos.com/products/endpoint-security-control/f/sophos-endpoint-software/100929/sophos-cloud-full-installer

    If you are not able to do so, contact us, give us 8tsd euro and wi will do it for you within a month ^^

    Stefan H supported this idea  · 
    Stefan H commented  · 

    ..and... the install should try the setup more times not only one time. As for example if the devices are not powered on at planned setup time. So it should for eg. try again for x times or for x hours/days or every x hours

    Stefan H commented  · 

    In addition to this deployment software, i would suggest to integrate optional parameters (like the old depyloyment packager had) may just to fill in, to determine the target groups the new device and/or user should be placed into

    Stefan H commented  · 
    Stefan H commented  · 
    Stefan H commented  · 

    To get this Request better found via search, i post this keywords in comments:
    Deployment Packager, Deployment Tool, Remote Installation, Remote Deployment, Remote Installer, Endpoint Deployment, Server Deployment

    Stefan H commented  · 

    I can agree with that. A remote installer is needed. It should be capable of installing Endpoint/Server/Intercept Protection within targeting single ip, ip-ranges and of course Active Directory paths. For better usability it should be possible that the software when AD-Computers are targetet and the agent is not installed, that it tries multiple configurable times. For eg. if not installed try to install and if error try again every 2 hours.

  2. 187 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    31 comments  ·  XG Firewall » Base System + General UI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    What we will do:
    Allow XG software installer to run on XG hardware appliances, after removing current partitions (same option as UTM9)

    What we are not planning:
    We will not allow software install to run trivially on a system currently installed with XG.
    We will not make any effort to support on-system wireless, on software installs.
    The system will not report itself in any way as an XG appliance, inside the OS.

    Stefan H commented  · 

    Im bought some SG105 Rev2 Hardware. Give it a memory update. So know i tried to install XG Home Edition 17.5xx no problem, install success with hardware edition download. But i have no chance to register it for private use... what a mess..

    Stefan H supported this idea  · 
  3. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  SG UTM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H commented  · 

    Can support this feature. Outgoing TLS to specific domains is a needed feature. Also already built in at competitor products. Alltrough, incoming domain sepecifica are already there, so just change a few lines in the exim.conf file to support this, nothing great developement needed.

  4. 31 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SG UTM » Mail Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H supported this idea  · 
    Stefan H commented  · 

    Can support this. A vote for german language from our side.

  5. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SG UTM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H supported this idea  · 
    Stefan H commented  · 

    Can support this. Please add special characters.

  6. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SG UTM » Mail Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H commented  · 
  7. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Mail Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H supported this idea  · 
  8. 129 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  32 comments  ·  SG UTM » Networking  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H commented  · 

    Unintelligible for me that it is'nt already implemented since years. Without this it is impossible blocking or allowing special ports to special destinations. Its impossible to handle hundrets of single entries that change every second day. No way, this wildcard (which is already a feature on other vendors since years) is truly needed.

    Stefan H supported this idea  · 
  9. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H supported this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H shared this idea  · 
  11. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Network Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H shared this idea  · 
  12. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Network Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H supported this idea  · 
  13. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stefan H shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

icon-data-protection icon-endpoint-protection icon-phish-threat icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-mobile icon-sophos-utm icon-sophos-utm icon-sophos-utm icon-web-appliance icon-xg-firewall icon-xg-firewall icon-avid-secure icon-lightbulbCreated with Sketch.