Sophos Ideas

Do you have an idea for a Sophos product? Do you recognize a good idea when you see one? We want to hear from you!

BarryG

My feedback

  1. 61 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    23 comments  ·  SG UTM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    PCI requires periodically running a WiFi analyzer to check for Rogue APs.
    THIS IS NOT THE SAME AS AN IPS.

    PCI also has requirements for IPS', which the UTM covers, as long as a human reads the reports.

    as far as the Rogue AP stuff goes, run a scanner yourself, or vote for http://feature.astaro.com/forums/17359-utm-formerly-asg-feature-requests/suggestions/2862436-wireless-protection-site-monitoring-tool

  4. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    Completed in 9.0.

  6. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    It looks like this is possible in 9.006; I can see my VLAN interfaces in the listed choices.

  7. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 187 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    30 comments  ·  SG UTM » Wireless Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SG UTM » Web Server Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 49 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  SG UTM » Web Server Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    This is probably needed for PCI compliance, unless the weak ciphers have already been disabled.

    It would still make future PCI changes easier to deal with (e.g. when BEAST was discovered, etc.)

  12. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  SG UTM » Web Server Protection  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    This is a good idea, but there should be a warning that CPU usage will increase somewhat on the UTM.

  13. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  SG UTM » VPN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    how about expiring their password, and notifying the admin?

  14. 126 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  SG UTM » VPN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    If implemented, I would like this to include an option to disable outgoing traffic if the VPN goes down, as well as an email notification.

  15. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SG UTM » Usability/GUI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    A similar situation manifests when adding a new group, and wanting to incorporate an existing definition; one has to modify everything that depended on the definition first.

  16. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  SG UTM » Usability/GUI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SG UTM » Usability/GUI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG supported this idea  · 
  18. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  SG UTM » Usability/GUI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    probably already completed.

  19. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SG UTM » Usability/GUI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    I think this has been implemented.

  20. 185 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google Sophos Features & Ideas Laboratory
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    26 comments  ·  SG UTM » Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    BarryG commented  · 

    similar to / duplicate of (multiple) other UPS feature requests.

    BarryG supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base

icon-data-protection icon-endpoint-protection icon-phish-threat icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-central icon-sophos-mobile icon-sophos-utm icon-sophos-utm icon-sophos-utm icon-web-appliance icon-xg-firewall icon-xg-firewall icon-avid-secure icon-lightbulbCreated with Sketch.